The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-20153•United States v. Hester
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 30, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________
No. 05-20153
____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SUNG CHO (STEVE) HESTER; HYUN UU KIM,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
4:03-CR-477-2
Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Sung Cho “Steve” Hester (“Hester”) and Hyun Uu Kim (“Kim”) appeal their convictions for
conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. Kim also appeals
his conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime.
Having carefully considered each of Hester’s and Kim’s points of error in light of the record, the
written and oral arguments of the parties, and the applicable law, and having found no reversible
-- 1 of 2 --
2
error, we affirm the defendants’ convictions. We decline to entertain Hester’s ineffective assistance
of counsel claim, which he raises for the first time in this appeal, but we do so without prejudice to
such rights as Hester may have to raise this issue collaterally in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
See United States v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 560, 581 (5th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.