Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 10, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-40127
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BILLY J. PEACOCK,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:03-CR-392-6
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Billy J. Peacock has moved for leave to withdraw
and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Peacock has not filed a response. Our review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
