United States v. McMorris

05-41054Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSep 14, 2006

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 14, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-41054
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODNEY DEWAYNE MCMORRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CR-74-3
--------------------
Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Dewayne Morris
has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McMorris has filed
a response in which he requests the appointment of new counsel.
The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal based on
McMorris’s appeal waiver.
Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
Morris’s reply discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 05-41054
-2-
excused from further responsibilities, defendant’s motion for
appointment of new counsel is DENIED, the Government’s motion to
dismiss is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.