Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-50531
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:03-CR-551-1
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Flores has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Flores received a
copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
