The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-60464•Trejo-Romero v. Gonzales
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 1, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-60464
Summary Calendar
CRESCENCIO TREJO-ROMERO,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A76 823 890
-------------------------------------------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Crescencio Trejo-Romero seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(BIA) decision affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of adjustment of status. Trejo-Romero
has also filed a motion to remand correctly contending that recent amendments to 8 C.F.R. § 1245
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 05-60464
-2-
-2-
eliminate the regulatory basis for the immigration judge’s decision denying him adjustment of status.
See 71 Fed. Reg. 27585 (May 12, 2006). The respondent does not oppose the motion to remand.
Accordingly, Trejo-Romero’s petition for review and motion to remand are GRANTED, the
BIA’s decision is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for a determination of whether Trejo-
Romero qualifies for adjustment of status pursuant to amended 8 C.F.R. § 1245.2(a)(1)(ii).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.