The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-61011•Johnson, et al v. Louisville Ladder Gr
05-61011Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 9, 2006
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 9, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 05-61011
_______________
MALINDA JOHNSON AND BUBBA JOHNSON,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
DAVIDSON LADDER, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants,
LOUISVILLE LADDER GROUP, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
m 2:03-CV-227
______________________________
Before SMITH, GARZA, and CLEMENT,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM*:
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and
pertinent parts of the record, as well as the ap-
plicable law. Having done so, we conclude
that the district court committed no error of
law or fact. Therefore, we AFFIRM for essen-
tially the reasons stated by the district court in
its comprehensive Memorandum Opinion.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has deter-
mined that this opinion should not be published and is
not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.