The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-61184•Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Cynthia Fletcher
05-61184Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 22, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 22, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 05-61184
Summary Calendar
_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CYNTHIA FLETCHER; GLORIA JEAN BARNES;
DAVID BARNES, Minors, by Rv. THEOTIS
SMITH, As Next Friend, Appearing on
Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated,
Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellees
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; ET AL,
Defendants
SIMPSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant-Appellant
---------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(3:70-CV-4706)
---------------------
Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
On appeal, Defendant-Appellant Simpson County School District
(“the District”) asks this court to reverse the district court’s
-- 1 of 2 --
ruling that denied the District’s efforts to be declared unitary
and the continuing court-supervised desegregation case against it
dismissed. The district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order
appealed from granted the District’s motion in part, declaring
unitary status in the areas of student body compositions,
transportation, extracurricular activities, and facilities. It
denied unitary status, however, and thereby retained oversight,
regarding faculty and staff assignments. The court thus retained
jurisdiction under the consent decree and reserved the option to
re-evaluate the District’s position in one year.
Based on our extensive review of the record on appeal and the
parties’ briefs, we perceive no reversible error of fact or law,
and therefore affirm the ruling of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.