Shirlene Gray v. Sage Telecom Inc

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-11132
SHIRLENE GRAY
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
SAGE TELECOM INC
Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
Cause No. 3:05-CV-1677
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for essentially the
reasons given by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order
entered October 3, 2006, which cannot be improved upon. The district court, in
perhaps an excess of caution, discussed the impact of Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa,
539 U.S. 90 (2003), on claims of retaliation under Title VII. In plaintiff-
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 7, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-11132
2
appellant Shirlene Gray’s appellate brief, that issue is inadequately briefed (as
it was in the district court), and in affirming the district court’s judgment, we do
not address (because we need not, see L & A Contracting Co. v. Southern
Concrete Services, Inc., 17 F.3d 106, 113 (5th Cir. 1994)) that issue or the district
court’s conclusions with respect thereto.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --