Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Frederick William Sturm, Jr

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-11403
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FREDERICK WILLIAM STURM, JR
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:05-CR-16-5
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Frederick William Sturm, Jr. has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sturm has filed a response. The record is
insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Sturm’s conflict of
interest and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See United States v.
Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Sturm’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
January 8, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-11403
2
appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --