The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-20187•Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sheronda Jackson
06-20187Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 8, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-20187
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SHERONDA JACKSON
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-411-4
Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has filed a response. The record is insufficiently
developed to allow consideration at this time of Jackson’s claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th
Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 8, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-20187
2
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.