Henderson v. Dretke, et al

06-40044Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitOct 24, 2006

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-40044
Conference Calendar
VERLIE LEE HENDERSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; RISSIE OWENS, Chairwoman,
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles; DAN JONES, Special Review
Unit, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:05-CV-383
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Verlie Lee Henderson, Texas prisoner # 199786, appeals the
dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A. In that complaint, Henderson challenged the
constitutionality of Texas’ parole procedures. Henderson’s
brief, however, does not address the district court’s
determinations that (1) Fifth Circuit precedent deemed his ex
post facto claim frivolous and (2) his due process challenge was

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-40044
-2-
not cognizable in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. These issues
are therefore waived. See Brinkman v. Dallas County Deputy
Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
Henderson’s appeal is frivolous and is therefore dismissed.
See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R.
42.2. We remind Henderson that, after the docketing of the
instant appeal, we imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar in
Henderson v. Enns, No. 05-40279 (5th Cir. Apr. 27, 2006)
(unpublished). Consequently, Henderson is barred from proceeding
in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is
incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.