United States v. Guerrero-Hernandez

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 4, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-40288
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARICELA GUERRERO-HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-1741
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Maricela Guerrero-Hernandez (Guerrero) appeals the sentence
that she received after she pleaded guilty to transporting an
undocumented alien within the United States for financial gain.
Her argument that the district court violated United States v.
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), when it enhanced her sentence on
facts not alleged in the indictment or admitted is meritless.
See United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 793, 798 (5th Cir. 2006),
cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2884 (2006). Guerrero’s argument that
the district court erred when it enhanced her sentence pursuant

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-40288
-2-
to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5) because Mendoza was in the “backseat
area” of the vehicle is likewise without merit. See United
States v. Zuniga-Amezquita, 468 F.3d 886, 887 (5th Cir. 2006);
§ 2L1.1(b)(5), comment. (n.6). Last, the district court’s
sentence, which was within the guidelines range of imprisonment,
was reasonable. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520
(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005); 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --