The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-41209•United States v. Arrellano-Barrientos
06-41209Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 7, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 7, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-41209
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCOS DAVID ARRELLANO-BARRIENTOS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:04-CR-1082
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marcos David
Arrellano-Barrientos raises arguments that are foreclosed by
United States v. Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454, 457 (5th Cir.
2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1398 (2006), which held that a
Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was equivalent to
burglary of a dwelling, and by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-41209
-2-
offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.