The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-41586•Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kendrick Lamond Thomas
06-41586Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 20, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-41586
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KENDRICK LAMOND THOMAS
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CR-6-2
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Kendrick Lamond Thomas has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Thomas’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 20, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-41586
2
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Thomas’s motion to
appeal pro se is DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.