United States v. Sandoval-Vallejo

06-50295Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitOct 5, 2006

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 5, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-50295
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFREDO SANDOVAL-VALLEJO, also known as Alfredo Vallejo,
also known as Alfredo Galindo,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:05-CR-2018-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo Sandoval-
Vallejo raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.
Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir. 1997), which held
that a Texas felony conviction for possession of marijuana was an
"aggravated felony" under § 2L1.2(b) of the Sentencing
Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.