Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Procopio Ramirez-Gomez

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-50900
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
PROCOPIO RAMIREZ-GOMEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:05-CR-1129-ALL
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Procopio Ramirez-Gomez
(Ramirez) raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense.
See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition
for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). Ramirez has served his term of
incarceration and has been removed from the United States. Ramirez also raises
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rosenbaum-
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 12, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-50900
Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed, (June 25, 2007) (No.
06-12082), which held that an appeal of a sentence is moot when the appellant
has been removed and is barred from entering the United States. The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. The appeal is
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --