United States v. Flores

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 24, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-51424
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARTIN MICHAEL FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:06-CR-155-ALL
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Martin Michael Flores has appealed the sentence imposed
following revocation of his term of supervised release. Flores
argues that his 24-month sentence is unreasonable because it is
above the advisory guideline range and the sentencing factors
cited by the district court are taken into account by the
Sentencing Guidelines.
The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors when imposing Flores’s sentence. See United
States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir. 2001). The

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 06-51424
-2-
sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable.
See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005),
cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1804 (2006).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --