Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Victor Rubio-Lopez

07-10194Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitOct 3, 2007

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-10194
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
VICTOR RUBIO-LOPEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:06-CR-127-1
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Rubio-Lopez raises
arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.
224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and
not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624,
625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 3, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-10280
2
Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.