The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-10881•IN Re: SEALED APPELLANT SEALED v. Sealed
07-10881Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 4, 2007
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-10881
IN Re: SEALED APPELLANT
SEALED APPELLANT
Appellant
v.
SEALED INTERVENOR
Intervenor–Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(07-MC-41)
Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reason that there was no
abuse of discretion by that court, and we could not say under this record that this court
should order discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, before the German court has
ruled on the same discovery request.
AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 3, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.