The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-20010•Callegari v. Thomas, et al
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 19, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 07-20010
Summary Calendar
_______________________
SANDY RENE CALLEGARI, Individually and As Surviving Heir At Law,
and Next of Kin of Mr. Sandy Leroy Booker Jr. Deceased,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TOMMY THOMAS, In His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Harris
County, Texas; HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
No. 4:06-CV-2843
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The court has carefully reviewed this § 1983 appeal in
light of the briefs and pertinent parts of the record. Having done
so, we find no reversible error of law or fact. The district court
correctly concluded that the plaintiff failed to allege the
existence of an official policy or custom attributable to Harris
County. See Cox v. City of Dallas, 430 F.3d 734, 748-49 (5th Cir.
2006). The court also acted within its discretion by denying leave
-- 1 of 2 --
2
to amend the complaint. See Goldstein v. MCI WorldCom, 340 F.3d
238, 254-55 (5th Cir. 2003). We therefore AFFIRM for essentially
the reasons stated by the trial court.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.