The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-20611•Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jose Barron Gonzalez, also known as Jose Barron-Gonzalez, also known as Fernando…
07-20611Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJan 30, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-20611
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE BARRON GONZALEZ, also known as Jose Barron-Gonzalez, also known
as Fernando Garza, also known as Jose Gonzalez, also known as Juan Jose
Barron Gonzales, also known as Jose B Gonzalez, also known as Fernando
Gonzalez, also known as Jose Gonzalez Barron
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:07-CR-54-1
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Barron Gonzalez raises
arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.
224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and
not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624,
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
January 30, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 07-20611
2
625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202).
The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.