The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-30925•Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Marion Catalano
07-30925Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSep 10, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-30925
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARION CATALANO
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:06-CR-60079-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Marion Catalano appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction
for possession of child pornography. He argues that, in light of Gall v. United
States, 128 S. Ct. 586 (2007), the district court committed procedural error in
sentencing him when it refused to consider important factors under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) regarding his health and need for psychological treatment. He argues
that the district court relied on case law of this court that likely has not survived
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 10, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 07-30925
2
Gall and that such case law had a “chilling effect” on the district court
concerning the appropriate weight to give to his mitigating circumstances.
A review of the record indicates that the district court did not refuse to
consider Catalano’s health conditions in sentencing him. Immediately before
and after pronouncing Catalano’s sentence, the district court explicitly stated
that it took into account his health issues. There is no indication in the record
of any chilling effect concerning the weight accorded Catalano’s mitigating
circumstances.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.