Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Felipe Horacio Lopez-Salazar

07-40715Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 10, 2008

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-40715
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FELIPE HORACIO LOPEZ-SALAZAR
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-1304-1
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Felipe Horacio Lopez-Salazar has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez-Salazar has filed a response. The record
is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Lopez-Salazar’s
claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be
resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 10, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-40715
2
court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the
allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)
(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Lopez-Salazar’s response discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.