The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-41152•Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Gregory Darnell Akins
07-41152Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 20, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-41152
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
GREGORY DARNELL AKINS
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:07-CR-35-2
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Gregory Darnell Akins has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Akins has filed a response. The record is insufficiently
developed to allow consideration at this time of Akins’s claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal
when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 20, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 07-41152
2
existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v.
Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and
citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
Akins’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Akins’s motions for appointment of new counsel and for transcripts are
DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.