Summary Calendar JOHN EGOREE v. Travis County State Jail; Department of Corrections; Nathaniel Quarterman

07-50039Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitNov 21, 2007

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-50039
Summary Calendar
JOHN E GOREE
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
TRAVIS COUNTY STATE JAIL; DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS; NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:06-CV-618
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John E. Goree, Texas prisoner # 1334846, appeals the dismissal without
prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. Goree argues that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s (TDCJ)
grievance procedure was not the proper means to address his complaints and
that the I-60 complaint procedure was an appropriate alternative which satisfied
the exhaustion requirement. He also argues that the unsanitary conditions at
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 21, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-50039
2
the Travis County jail and the absence of durable utensils and drinking cups
violated his Eighth Amendment rights.
After the district court’s judgment, the Supreme Court held “that failure
to exhaust is an affirmative defense under the PLRA, and that inmates are not
required to specially plead or demonstrate exhaustion in their complaints.”
Jones v. Bock, 127 S. Ct. 910, 921 (2007). As this action was dismissed prior to
service on the defendants, and it is not clear from the complaint that Goree
exhausted his administrative remedies, the district court erred by sua sponte
dismissing Goree’s suit. See Carbe v. Lappin, 492 F.3d 325, 328 (5th Cir. 2007).
The district court’s judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED
for further proceedings consistent with Jones.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.