The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-51205•Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Frank Escarcega-Ramirez
07-51205Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 30, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-51205
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANK ESCARCEGA-RAMIREZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:07-CR-1341-ALL
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Frank Escarcega-Ramirez
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty
provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-
Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 30, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 07-51205
2
The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.