Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Pedro Cervantes-Ramirez

07-51462Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 4, 2008

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-51462
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
PEDRO CERVANTES-RAMIREZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:07-CR-428-ALL
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Pedro Cervantes-Ramirez
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty
provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-
Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 4, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-51462
2
The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.