The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-20107•Summary Calendar PATRICIA SMITH v. JOHN EPOTTER, United States Postal Service
08-20107Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 8, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-20107
Summary Calendar
PATRICIA SMITH
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
JOHN E POTTER, United States Postal Service; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF LETTER CARRIERS LOCAL BRANCH 283
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CV-3278
Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Patricia Smith brought an action in the district court, alleging that she
was discriminated against because of her race, sex, and/or age; that her
suspension and termination were inspired by a retaliatory motive; and that her
constitutional rights were violated. On January 15, 2008, the district court
granted summary judgment in favor of the United States Postal Service and
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 8, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 08-20107
2
entered a Memorandum and Order. For the reasons stated in the district court’s
well-reasoned opinion, summary judgment was proper. AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.