The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-50080•Summary Calendar DWAYNE ACULPEPPER v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission
08-50080Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitNov 12, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 08-50080
Summary Calendar
_____________________
DWAYNE A CULPEPPER
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION; CRAIG
BOBO, Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Employee;
individually and in his official capacities; LIEUTENANT R H
“HANK” BLANCHARD, Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission,
individually and in his official capacities; REESE BOWEN, Chief,
individually; THE CHILDRESS INDEX; CHRIS BLACKBURN,
Editor, individually and in his official capacities; MICHAEL PIGG,
Childress County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacities;
JENNIFER FOSTER, District Director for State Senator Robert
Duncan, individually and in her official capacity; ADAM BISHOP,
individually; BISHOP ENTERPRISES
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(1:06-CV-830)
Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Dwayne A. Culpepper appeals the November 19,
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 12, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
2
2007 Final Judgment of the district court, separately rendered to effectuate
the court’s Order on Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge of October 22, 2007, overruling Culpepper’s objections,
approving and accepting said Report and Recommendation, granting the
several dismissal motions of the various defendants, and dismissing
Culpepper’s myriad claims against the multitude of defendants. As
Culpepper and all parties defendant have urged that oral argument not be
heard in this appeal, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal,
including, without limitation, the exhaustive Report and Recommendation of
the magistrate judge and the Order of the district court thereon, as a result of
which we are convinced that the Final Judgment of the district court should
be affirmed in all respects.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.