The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-10022•United States v. Bradley
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 20-10022
Conference Calendar
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
William Theodore Bradley, also known as Billy Bradley,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:19-CR-71-1
Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William
Theodore Bradley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bradley has filed a response. The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
forth in 5
TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 14, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-10022 Document: 00515563757 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2020
No. 20-10022
2
record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of
Bradley’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to
consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States
v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Bradley’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5
TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case: 20-10022 Document: 00515563757 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2020
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.