United States v. Burney

20-10153Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSep 29, 2020

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10153
Conference Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

David Burney, also known as David Francis,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:19-CR-304-3

Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent David Burney has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Burney has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 29, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-10153 Document: 00515582463 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2020

No. 20-10153
2
us to make a fair evaluation of Burney’s claims of ineffective assistance of
counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Burney’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5
TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case: 20-10153 Document: 00515582463 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2020

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.