The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-10536•United States v. Rudzavice
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 20-10536
Summary Calendar
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
James L. Rudzavice,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No.
4:0 7-CR-138- 1
USDC No. 4:20-CV-505
Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
James Rudzavice was convicted of child pornography offenses and
sentenced to 360 months in prison. United States v. Rudzavice, 586 F.3d 310,
312-13 (5th Cir. 2009). He appeals from the district court’s denial of a motion
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 18, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-10536 Document: 00515679678 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
No. 20-10536
2
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), in which he
argued that the threat of COVID-19 in prison constituted extraordinary and
compelling reasons for release. He asserts on appeal that he has already
contracted COVID-19 once and fears reinfection. He also asserts that the
district court was biased, and he seeks a remand for reconsideration by a
different judge.
We need not decide whether the risk of reinfection constitutes an
extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release because the
district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Rudzavice
remained a danger to the safety of others and that his immediate release after
serving less than half of his sentence would not be in the interest of justice
and would minimize the seriousness of his crimes. See United States v.
Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 692-93 (5th Cir. 2020).
The judgment is AFFIRMED. Rudzavice’s motion for appointment
of counsel and all of his other requests for relief are DENIED.
Case: 20-10536 Document: 00515679678 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.