Jesse Sembly; Tyese Graham v. U.s. Bank National Association Nd

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 12a1279n.06
No. 12-1134
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JESSE SEMBLY; TYESE GRAHAM,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Before: MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges; BERTELSMAN, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs-Appellants Jesse Sembly and Tyese Graham (“Plaintiffs”) appeal
the dismissal of their action arising from the foreclosure on their home. In their brief, Plaintiffs
make no effort to address the Rule 9(b), 12(b)(6), and other deficiencies identified by the district
court as grounds for dismissal. Nor do they set forth a rationale supporting their view that the district
court erred. Instead, they argue for standing to challenge the foreclosure sale, even though the
district court decided the standing issue in their favor. They also perfunctorily raise issues related
to promissory estoppel, preemption, and Michigan’s statute of frauds. Because Plaintiffs have not
adequately addressed in their brief on appeal the district court’s reasons for dismissing their
complaint, we AFFIRM.
The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District*
of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 1 --