The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1270•Louis Chandler v. MIKE BROWN, Warden
23-1270Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitMay 9, 2025
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
File Name: 25a0122p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
LOUIS CHANDLER,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MIKE BROWN, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
┐
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
┘
No. 23-1270
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette.
No. 2:19-cv-00263—Paul Lewis Maloney, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: May 9, 2025
Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE,
STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, MURPHY,
DAVIS, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.*
_________________
COUNSEL
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Ann M. Sherman, Jared D. Schultz, OFFICE
OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. ON
RESPONSE: Jessica Zimbelman, STATE APPELLATE DEFENDER OFFICE, Lansing,
Michigan, Matthew A. Monahan, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Detroit,
Michigan, for Appellant.
*Judge White was not eligible to participate in the vote on whether to grant the petition for rehearing en
banc, see 6 Cir. I.O.P. 40(f), but was eligible to participate in deliberations after the Court granted en banc review,
see 6 Cir. I.O.P. 40(g).
>
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 23-1270 Chandler v. Brown Page 2
_________________
ORDER
_________________
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en
banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 40(d) provides as follows:
A decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment
of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending
appeal.
Separately, a majority of the en banc Court has voted to return the case to the original
panel for entry of an amended opinion.
ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court
are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the case be referred to the original panel for entry of an
amended opinion that will issue forthwith.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
__________________________________
Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.