The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2286•United States of America v. CHARLES T. McINTOSH
12-2286Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitAug 28, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted August 23, 2012
Decided August 28, 2012
Before
WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
No. 12‐2286
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff‐Appellee,
v.
CHARLES T. McINTOSH,
Defendant‐Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
No. 1:07‐cr‐00073‐WCG‐1
William C. Griesbach,
Judge.
O R D E R
We have considered the Anders brief submitted by the attorney for the defendant‐
appellant, Charles T. McIntosh. The brief is sufficient on its face and we agree that there are
no non‐frivolous grounds for appeal. The motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is
dismissed.
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.