Christine Bryant v. Compass Group USA, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
June 30, 2020
Before
DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge
KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
No. 20‐1443
CHRISTINE BRYANT,
Plaintiff‐Appellee,
v.
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.,
Defendant‐Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division.
No. 19 C 6622
Virginia M. Kendall,
Judge.
O R D E R
Defendant‐Appellant Compass Group, Inc., filed a petition for rehearing and
rehearing en banc on May 19, 2020. No judge in regular active service has requested a
vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all of the judges on the panel have voted
to deny rehearing, but to amend the opinion as follows, on page 16 of the slip opinion,
to add two new sentences after the first sentence under heading II.D.:
“Bryant’s claim under section 15(a) is a separate matter. Importantly,
Bryant alleged only a claim under the provision of that section requiring
development of a “written policy, made available to the public, establishing a
retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric
identifiers and biometric information,” not under the provision requiring
compliance with the established retention schedule and destruction guidelines.
Our analysis is thus limited to the theory she invoked. Section 15(a) obligates
private entities … .”

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 20‐1443 Page 2
With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is
DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --