The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1285•RANDALL P. EWING , J R . and YASMANY GOMEZ v. ERIK CARRIER and D’APRILE PROPERTIES, LLC
24-1285Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitSep 30, 2024
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted September 27, 2024
Decided September 30, 2024
Before
J OEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge
MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER , Circuit Judge
No. 24-1285
R ANDALL P. EWING , J R . and YASMANY G OMEZ,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ERIK C ARRIER and D’APRILE P ROPERTIES, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern
Division.
No. 19-cv-03791
Sharon Johnson Coleman,
Judge.
O R D E R
For the reasons stated in Ewing v. Carrier, 35 F.4th 592 (7th Cir. 2022), and the de-
cision on remand, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34002 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 16, 2024), plus the decision
in Ewing v. 1645 W. Farragut LLC, 90 F.4th 876 (7th Cir. 2024), the judgment is summar-
ily affirmed. Ewing and Gomez received in the 1645 W. Farragut decision all of the relief
to which they are entitled, given their delay in asserting claims against other related
persons and their abandonment of alter-ego theories in the Rule 69 collection proceed-
ings following 1645 W. Farragut.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.