The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1918•United States of America, for the use and benefit of Triple S Alarm Co., Inc. v. Westfield Insurance Company
12-1918Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-3030
___________________________
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Triple S Alarm Co., Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Westfield Insurance Company
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: April 9, 2013
Filed: April 12, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Triple S Alarm Co., Inc., appeals from the judgment of the District Court 1
denying its motion for attorney fees and a penalty under Arkansas law or attorney fees
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b), in Triple S’s suit under
the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131. After careful de novo review of the record, see
United States v. Brummels, 15 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir. 1994), and having considered
the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the District Court that Triple S was
not entitled to the relief that it sought for the reasons explained in the court’s opinion.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.