The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1918•Richard Litschewski, Plaintiff - Appellant, Nancy Litschewski v. Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison
12-1918Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-3338
___________________________
Richard Litschewski,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
Nancy Litschewski; Aaron Litschewski; Darcy Litschewski; Arica Overby; Steve Overby,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs,
v.
Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison; John Does; Jane Does;
Melinda Johnson, Records Administrator, South Dakota State Penitentiary;
Unnamed Construction Co.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
____________
Submitted: April 18, 2013
Filed: April 23, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Inmate Richard Litschewski appeals the district court’s adverse judgment in1
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Bahl v. County of Ramsey,2
695 F.3d 778, 783 (8th Cir. 2012) (summary judgment); King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr.,
598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (Prison Litigation Reform Act’s administrative-
exhaustion provision), we conclude that affirmance is warranted on the merits, see
Wood v. SatCom Mktg., LLC, 705 F.3d 823, 827 (8th Cir. 2013) (summary judgment
may be affirmed on any basis supported by record). The judgment of the district
court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Litschewski’s motion to
supplement his brief.
_____________________________
The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, United States District Judge for the District1
of South Dakota.
We have not considered matters Litschewski has waived on appeal. See2
Coates v. Powell, 639 F.3d 471, 475 n.5 (8th Cir. 2011).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.