The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-2514•United States of America v. Wesley Keith Beagle
12-2514Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-3245
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Wesley Keith Beagle
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
____________
Submitted: May 3, 2013
Filed: May 7, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
While Wesley Beagle was serving a second period of supervised release
following his release from imprisonment on a federal firearms conviction, he admitted
-- 1 of 2 --
to violating a condition of his supervised release, and the district court revoked1
supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence consisting of 12 months in
prison and 6 months of supervised release. Beagle appeals, arguing that the sentence
imposed is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence, which falls within
statutory limits and the recommended Guidelines range, is not substantively
unreasonable. See United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 2011) (per
curiam); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District1
of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.