The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1720•United States of America v. Raul Hernandez Guzman
12-1720Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 30, 2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1956
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Raul Hernandez Guzman
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: August 7, 2013
Filed: August 20, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Raul Guzman appeals the ten-month prison sentence that the District Court1
imposed upon his guilty plea to illegally reentering the United States after having
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the1
Southern District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
been previously deported following a felony conviction. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1).
Guzman’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Guzman’s sentence was unreasonable
and that he should have been sentenced to time served. We conclude that the
sentence—which is at the bottom of the uncontested Guidelines range—is not
unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461, 464 (8th Cir. 2009)
(en banc). Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion
to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.