The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-3189•Addones Spencer v. S. Phillips, RN, Federal Correctional Complex-Forrest City
11-3189Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 29, 2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1904
___________________________
Addones Spencer
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
S. Phillips, RN, Federal Correctional Complex-Forrest City; William Resto,
Doctor, Federal Correctional Complex-Forrest City; T. Hall, Teacher, FCI-Forrest
City; S. Lopez, Unit Counselor, FCI-Forrest City
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: October 31, 2013
Filed: November 5, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Federal inmate Addones Spencer appeals following the district court’s1
dismissal of his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Upon de novo review, see King v. Iowa Dep’t of
Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010), we conclude that the district court
properly denied preliminary injunctive relief and, based on the record before the
court, correctly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of administrative
exhaustion. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2
______________________________
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the1
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
In his appellate submissions, Spencer raises several new matters. We decline2
to address them. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.