The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-3968•Jerry J. Duwenhoegger, Sr. v. John R. King
12-3968Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2014
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1890
___________________________
Jerry J. Duwenhoegger, Sr.
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
John R. King; Steven Hammer; Mary McComb; Greg Lindell; Richard D. Wilson;
David Reishus; Sheryl Vezner; Jonathon Weiss; Deborah Schadegg; Jeff L.
Amberg; Deborah A. Garbison; Scott A. Behrends; Lana K. Jensen; David S.
Loetscher; Christopher Chute; Paul D. Hoflund; Joseph Hobson; Michael S.
Green; June E. Lind; Shannon Reimann; Christopher Seidler; John Sofie; Nicholas
Duffy; Susan M. Armstrong; Courtney Felda; Jenny M. Carufel; Leigh C. McCoy;
Andrew Leiffort; David Crist; Joan M. Fabian; Michael F. Rogosheske; Daniel
Kelley; John C. Hillyard; Richard S. Pung; Roger J. Baburam; Natalie Leseman;
Lisa Rudeen; Sean E. Kelly
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: November 29, 2013
Filed: April 10, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
Jerry J. Duwenhoegger, Sr., appeals the district court’s adverse grant of1
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Green
v. Dormire, 691 F.3d 917, 921 (8th Cir. 2012), we affirm. We find no merit to the
assertions of error that Duwenhoegger identifies on appeal; and we decline to address
the new arguments, claims, and allegations that he raises, see Stone v. Harry, 364
F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004), or to consider the documents he has offered on
appeal for the first time, see McCleary v. ReliaStar Life Ins. Co., 682 F.3d 1116, 1120
(8th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 879 (2013). The judgment of the district2
court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District1
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S.
Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
We also do not consider the numerous claims Duwenhoegger has waived on2
appeal. See Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 703 F.3d 436, 438 n.3 (8th
Cir. 2013).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.