United States of America v. James D. Fugate

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3352
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
James D. Fugate
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: May 7, 2014
Filed: May 20, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

James Fugate appeals the 20-month prison sentence that the district court1
imposed upon him after revoking the supervised release that he had been serving for
three offenses. For reversal, Fugate argues that the sentence is excessive.
Upon careful review, see United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.
2005) (per curiam) (standard of review), we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion. The revocation sentence is within statutory limits, and at the
revocation hearing, the district court articulated multiple valid reasons for its
sentencing decision. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Mangum, 625 F.3d
466, 470 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 924 (8th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw.
We direct counsel to inform appellant about the procedures for filing a petition for
rehearing and for certiorari.
______________________________
1The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --