Inez Hunter v. Jane Anderson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3087
___________________________
Inez Hunter
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Jane Anderson; Northstar Residential, L.L.C.; John Duffy; Jeff Von Feldt; Jenel
Sauber; Pondview Townhomes of Woodbury, L.P.; John Does 1 through 50, in
Minnesota Department of Human Rights (“MDHR”); Kimberly Nevels; John Does
51 through 100, United States Department of Urban Development (“HUD”)
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: June 6, 2014
Filed: June 26, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Inez Hunter appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint raising a1
variety of housing-discrimination and state-law claims. Upon careful de novo review,
see Saterdalen v. Spencer, 725 F.3d 838, 840-41 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review),
we conclude the district court properly dismissed the complaint for the reasons
explained in the thorough report and recommendation that the court adopted.
Accordingly, we deny Hunter’s pending motions and we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now
retired.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --