The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1978•Donald Ray Copley v. State of Missouri
13-1978Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2014
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3628
___________________________
Donald Ray Copley
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
State of Missouri
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: July 18, 2014
Filed: July 28, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Donald Copley appeals after the district court dismissed his civil action, and1
denied his post-judgment motion. We deny Copley’s pending motions for a2
transcript and a change of venue; and following our careful review of the record
before us, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
the post-judgment motion, because Copley did not present circumstances justifying
relief. See In re Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Prod. Liab. Litig., 496 F.3d
863, 866 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
The appeal was dismissed as untimely as to the entry of final judgment, and2
has been allowed to proceed only as to the order denying post-judgment relief.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.