Valentino V. Warren v. Krispy Kreme Doughnuts

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1254
___________________________
Valentino V. Warren
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts; Hal Smith Restaurant Group; Charleston’s Restaurant
Group; A-OK, LLC; HS-Real Estate; Jason Hart
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: September 17, 2014
Filed: September 19, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Valentino Warren appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in his civil action asserting unlawful employment discrimination under Title
VII. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was properly
granted. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042, 1046 (8th Cir.
2011) (this court reviews grant of summary judgment de novo; summary judgment
is proper if pleadings, discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits
show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that movant is entitled
to judgment as matter of law); see also Edmund v. MidAmerican Energy Co., 299
F.3d 679, 686-87 (8th Cir. 2002) (federal courts do not sit as super personnel
department reviewing wisdom or fairness of business judgments made by employers,
except to extent those judgments involve intentional unlawful discrimination).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable James Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --