The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2592•Robert L. Bland v. O.p. & C.m.i.a.
13-2592Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2014
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1633
___________________________
Robert L. Bland
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
O.P. & C.M.I.A.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: September 18, 2014
Filed: September 24, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Robert L. Bland appeals the district court's order denying his motion for1
summary judgment and granting summary judgment for O.P. & C.M.I.A. (the union).
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
After de novo review, see Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042-43
(8th Cir. 2011) (en banc), we affirm. We conclude that summary judgment for the
union was appropriate. As Bland failed to produce evidence that the union referred
union members outside the protected class for work during the time in question, he
failed to support his Title VII claim that the union "fail[ed] or refuse[d] to refer [him]
for employment" on account of his race. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(c)(2); c.f. Jackson v.
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 643 F.3d 1081, 1086 (8th Cir. 2011).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.