The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2592•Guillermo Quinones v. United States of America
13-2592Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2014
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1670
___________________________
Guillermo Quinones
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: September 17, 2014
Filed: September 23, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guillermo Quinones appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his action
under the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of jurisdiction. After careful review, see
1The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe
J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
Appley Bros. v. United States, 164 F.3d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir. 1999) (findings of
fact are reviewed for clear error and application of law is reviewed de novo), we agree
with the district court that Quinones failed to timely present his claim to the Bureau
of Prisons, and thus dismissal was proper. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); Motley v. United
States, 295 F.3d 820, 822 (8th Cir. 2002); K.E.S. v. United States, 38 F.3d 1027, 1030
(8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny
Quinones’s appellate motion.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.