The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-3586•Kristoffer R. Bryan v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
13-3586Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 27, 2015
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2249
___________________________
Kristoffer R. Bryan
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: February 5, 2015
Filed: February 9, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kristoffer R. Bryan appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of1
supplemental security income. For reversal, Bryan argues that (1) the Administrative
The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
law Judge’s (ALJ’s) residual functional capacity determination was not supported by
substantial evidence and failed to account adequately for his mental impairments; (2)
the ALJ erroneously failed to find that his bipolar disorder and personality disorder
were severe impairments; and (3) the ALJ erroneously failed to find that his affective
disorder met or medically equaled Listing 12.04. Following careful review of the
parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that each of Bryan’s
arguments lacks merit. This is because substantial evidence in the record as a whole
supports the ALJ’s findings regarding residual functional capacity, the severity of
Bryan’s impairments, and his failure to meet listing requirements. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.